<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:base="http://everything2.com/">
    <title>sehrgut's New Writeups</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com/index.pl?node=Everything%20User%20Search&amp;usersearch=sehrgut" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="?node=New%20Writeups%20Atom%20Feed&amp;type=ticker&amp;foruser=sehrgut" />
    <id>http://everything2.com/?node=New%20Writeups%20Atom%20Feed&amp;foruser=sehrgut</id>
    <updated>2008-10-22T20:36:53Z</updated>
<entry><title>No, we're not friends. (person)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut/writeups/No%252C+we%2527re+not+friends."/><id>http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut/writeups/No%252C+we%2527re+not+friends.</id><author><name>sehrgut</name><uri>http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut</uri></author><published>2008-10-22T20:36:53Z</published><updated>2008-10-22T20:36:53Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Friday, at 11:59 PM, I was awake, reading.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Weeks and months of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/The+three+D%2527s+of+a+successful+relationship+-+Deny+Deny+Deny&quot;&gt;making excuses for her&lt;/a&gt;. It started small, with &lt;a href=&quot;/title/murmured+apologies&quot;&gt;murmured apologies&lt;/a&gt;, regrets well in advance. After a while, it got to where she'd call &amp;mdash; or worse, &lt;a href=&quot;/title/text-message+relationships&quot;&gt;text&lt;/a&gt; &amp;mdash; the night before or the day before or the hour before we were supposed to meet, always something'd come up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every individual excuse was perfectly legitimate. None of those &quot;I have to wash my hair&quot;-pitiful cop-outs. Individually, I'd've had to've been a cad to claim any excuse was really an avoidance. But in aggregate? No, &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Realizations+in+relationships&quot;&gt;in aggregate they couldn't be anything but intentional&lt;/a&gt;. Like I said, I spent the time making excuses for her, but eventually it stopped working.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the moment it &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Let+me+fall+until+I+believe%252C+you%2527re+more+than+the+leaves&quot;&gt;completely stopped working&lt;/a&gt; 
was on the Friday evening as I watched the clock roll over&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Roasting your own coffee beans (how-to)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut/writeups/Roasting+your+own+coffee+beans"/><id>http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut/writeups/Roasting+your+own+coffee+beans</id><author><name>sehrgut</name><uri>http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut</uri></author><published>2008-09-10T16:35:36Z</published><updated>2008-09-10T16:35:36Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;I started roasting for the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Any+sufficiently-involved+economization+is+indistinguishable+from+a+hobby&quot;&gt;economy&lt;/a&gt; of it. I mean, who can resist &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Cup+of+Excellence&quot;&gt;Cup of Excellence&lt;/a&gt;-level coffees at five or ten bucks a pound?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Okay, I'm also a &lt;a href=&quot;/title/coffee+snobs&quot;&gt;control freak&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My coffee must be roasted &lt;em&gt;my way&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Grrrrr.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course, the most important thing to be gained from homeroasted coffee is not economy, or even control. It's &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Immunity+from+caffeine+means+a+bedtime+double-cappa+instead+of+warm+milk&quot;&gt;flavour&lt;/a&gt;. Fortunately, economy need not be dropped as a consideration: you can go for cheap on both the roaster and the beans, and still have excellent coffee: green coffee, even the stuff in the top 5% of all coffee produced &amp;mdash; which is what most homeroasters &amp;mdash; get is not an expensive product.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An example I like to use is &lt;a href=&quot;/title/kopi+luwak&quot;&gt;kopi luwak&lt;/a&gt;. No, you don't want it. You really don't. Honest. Don't even click on the hardlink.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But if you did, you could procure it&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>coffee snobs (essay)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut/writeups/coffee+snobs"/><id>http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut/writeups/coffee+snobs</id><author><name>sehrgut</name><uri>http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut</uri></author><published>2008-09-09T17:34:07Z</published><updated>2008-09-09T17:34:07Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&quot;I didn't know &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Starbucks+isn%2527t+coffee&quot;&gt;Starbucks&lt;/a&gt; sold coffee,&quot; I murmur, appearing slightly intrigued. The impression I'm going for is one of minor, &quot;gee-whiz&quot; curiosity, as if you'd told me that &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Lowes&quot;&gt;Lowes&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Home+Depot&quot;&gt;Home Depot&lt;/a&gt; sold coffee.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Those who know me attempt desperately to steer the conversation off the &quot;coffee&quot; track. They've heard the litany of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/roast+and+grind+and+brew&quot;&gt;roast and grind and brew&lt;/a&gt; more times than you can shake two sticks at (though &lt;a href=&quot;/title/you+shouldn%2527t+shake+sticks%253A+you+could+poke+someone%2527s+eye+out&quot;&gt;you shouldn't shake sticks: you could poke someone's eye out&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Starbucks Fan, though, has not, and is generally thrown entirely off-kilter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;But&amp;mdash; um... I mean, you &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; don't know Starbucks is a coffee shop?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;It's not, that I'm aware of.&quot; Hooked. &quot;Oh! You mean that swamp water they sell!&quot; I generally don't tip my hand so quickly, but she looks like an easy mark.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Well I like it.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Of course you do! I used to like it, too.&quot; Listen, my child, and you shall hear of the midnight ride of Paul Revere, roast,&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>The human body as proof for evolution (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut/writeups/The+human+body+as+proof+for+evolution"/><id>http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut/writeups/The+human+body+as+proof+for+evolution</id><author><name>sehrgut</name><uri>http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut</uri></author><published>2008-06-10T17:23:21Z</published><updated>2008-06-10T17:23:21Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;As a &lt;a href=&quot;/title/The+Biologist%2527s+Valediction+to+His+Wife&quot;&gt;biologist&lt;/a&gt;, I feel compelled to point out that two of the organs offered as vestigial are not actually recognized as such today.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/Sacrum&quot;&gt;Sacrum&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The sacrum serves at least two vital functions. First, the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/sacral+nerves&quot;&gt;sacral nerves&lt;/a&gt; need to exit the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/spine&quot;&gt;spine&lt;/a&gt; below the juncture of spine and &lt;a href=&quot;/title/pelvis&quot;&gt;pelvis&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/title/innervation&quot;&gt;innervate&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/buttocks&quot;&gt;buttocks&lt;/a&gt;, legs, and other &lt;a href=&quot;/title/genitalia&quot;&gt;*ahem* important *ahem* organs&lt;/a&gt;. Without the sacrum descending below the rest of the spine as protection, these nerves would be much more prone to damage and &lt;a href=&quot;/title/paraplegia&quot;&gt;paraplegia&lt;/a&gt; would be correspondingly more common.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Further, the structure of the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/perineum&quot;&gt;perineum&lt;/a&gt; necessitates an attachment point for muscles which might be regarded as &quot;important&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;/title/defecation&quot;&gt;defecation&lt;/a&gt; would be either impossible or &quot;automatic&quot; depending on which muscles were detached) and &lt;a href=&quot;/title/vagina&quot;&gt;*ahem* important *ahem*&lt;/a&gt;. The &lt;a href=&quot;/title/coccyx&quot;&gt;coccyx&lt;/a&gt;, which articulates with the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/distal&quot;&gt;distal&lt;/a&gt; end of the sacrum, provides these anchorage points.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>argumentum ad nauseum (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut/writeups/argumentum+ad+nauseum"/><id>http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut/writeups/argumentum+ad+nauseum</id><author><name>sehrgut</name><uri>http://everything2.org:80/user/sehrgut</uri></author><published>2008-05-31T00:58:54Z</published><updated>2008-05-31T00:58:54Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Argumentum ad nauseam&lt;/em&gt; (sometimes &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/argumentum+ad+infinitum&quot;&gt;argumentum ad infinitum&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;) translates roughly as &quot;argument from &lt;a href=&quot;/title/nausea&quot;&gt;nausea&lt;/a&gt;&quot;: that is, a method of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/formal+logic&quot;&gt;proof&lt;/a&gt; in which one attempts to batter down opposition by nauseating repetition of a point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is axiomatically &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Logical+fallacy&quot;&gt;fallacious&lt;/a&gt;, since repetition of an idea has no bearing on the truth or falsehood of that idea. Unfortunately, it has great utility in the field of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/the+neural+stigmata+of+demagogues&quot;&gt;demagoguery&lt;/a&gt; due to the eager willingness of the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/sheeple&quot;&gt;hoi&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Stupid+people&quot;&gt;polloi&lt;/a&gt; to believe &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/The+Big+Lie&quot;&gt;The Big Lie&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
</entry></feed>
