Everything2
Near Matches
Ignore Exact
Full Text
Everything2

Hermeneutics

created by Webster 1913

(idea) by themusic (6.7 y) (print)   ?   (I like it!) 1 C! Sat Apr 15 2000 at 22:48:11

Hermeneutics may be more generally understood as understanding.

More than knowing, or knowledge, or epistemology, we need an understanding of the world, and all the things in it. As Susan Sontag has written, more than an epistemology of art, we need an erotics of art.

Though for me, I would be pleased to sail through the world of ideas, concepts, beliefs, philosophies, politics, policies, a Hermeneut forever seeking the golden fleece, and challenging the Sirens with my deafness.


(idea) by tallman (2.7 mon) (print)   ?   (I like it!) 3 C!s Wed Feb 06 2002 at 16:55:30

The theory and methodology of interpretation, especially of text (though it can also be applied to other media). It is generally applied to areas of tradition such as religious texts and legal precedents. Hermeneutics is derived from the Greek hermeneutika, a word that is, in itself, derived from the name of the Greek god Hermes, the messenger and interpreter of the gods.

Why hermeneutics are used
Language, especially figurative language, is often obscure and vague and thus needs to be interpreted. In the study of religious writings, it is often found that they are written in a certain vernacular and for a specific audience. In order to truly understand said writings, it is important to put them in their proper cultural and historical context.

The German philosopher Martin Heidegger was interested in reading philosophy in the original Greek, and noticed that translators often added their own interpretations as they translated. Again, in order to truly understand those texts, it is necessary to remove any bias by the translator.

It should be noted that hermeneutics cannot be used to rectify objective falsehoods, nor can it be used to verify the authenticity of a writing. Hermeneutics does not attempt to determine what is true or false, but only what the writer intended to say. This being said, a conclusion made with the use of hermeneutics is still open for revision and is never really complete (see hermeneutic circle below).

Application
This is where a text proves its value when applied to contemporary life. The application of hermeneutics allows, for example, a judge to apply the law to a case or a priest to write a sermon based on scripture. With their application, the judge and priest are creating a new interpretation, thereby changing the very principles they have applied. Future applications of the law or scripture may even use past applications as precedent (this is especially common in the practice of law).

The Hermeneutic Circle
This use of precedent in the application of hermeneutics represents what is called the hermeneutic circle, where our beliefs about a certain text are subjected to critical testing. It is actually similar to the way in which science is practiced. Scientists start by identifying a problem, and they theorize the answer to that problem. In performing and observing their experiment to test the problem, they gain new insights which must then be used to revise their hypothesis. This is basically a hermeneutic circle.

Another example: When reading a book, we are influenced by our overall view of the book's themes. But how are we to know the book's themes as a whole if we have not yet finished reading the parts of the book? We need to start reading the book with our own "pre-understanding", from which we hypothesize a main theme for the whole book. After we finish reading the book, we go back to each individual chapter with this main theme in mind to get a better understanding of how all the parts relate to the whole. During this process, we often end up changing our main theme. With the new information gained from this revision, we can again revise our main theme of the book, and so on, until we can see a coherent and consistent picture of the whole book. What we get out of this hermeneutic circle is not absolute and final, but it is considered to be reasonable because it has withstood the process of critical testing.

Hermeneutics of Suspicion and Affirmation
The French philosopher Paul Ricoeur found that he was uncomfortable with the subjective nature of hermeneutics. Each application of hermeneutics contains the bias of the person doing the application. Ricoeur points out three "master's of suspicion": Marx, Nietzche, and Freud. He recognized that their "hermeneutics of suspicion" presented an incomplete picture or religion. His response was to perform a "hermeneutics of affirmation" in order to achieve a sort of Hegelian equilibrium in which a synthesis transcends a critical or affirmative ideology and becomes a neutral one.
Sources:
http://szabo.best.vwh.net/hermeneutics.html
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07271a.htm
http://capo.org/premise/95/sep/p950812.html
http://www.vlsi.uwaterloo.ca/~khkwok/postmodernism/node60.html
http://www.geocities.com/philodept/diwatao/neutral_conception_of_ideology.htm

This is not meant to be an exhaustive discussion of hermeneutics; Though I am familiar with all the ideas discussed above, I am not an expert on the subject, and, as such, welcome any criticism or suggestions anyone might have.

(definition) by Webster 1913 (print) Wed Dec 22 1999 at 0:08:00

Her`me*neu"tics (?), n. [Gr. (sc. ).]

The science of interpretation and explanation; exegesis; esp., that branch of theology which defines the laws whereby the meaning of the Scriptures is to be ascertained.

Schaff-Herzog Encyc.

 

© Webster 1913.


printable version
chaos

epistemology Can computers think? Exegesis Susan Sontag
Hermeneutic True stuff in the Bible erotics Metaphor is not disposable
implicit anti-Semitism in liberal Christianity heuristic there is a level in the world beyond the physical la grande ligne
belief vs. metaphor The translator's task Fashionable Nonsense Knowledge: Religious vs. Scientific
Martin Heidegger Judeo-Christian Golden Fleece If we define things as real, they are real in their consequences
Bruno Latour and the Strong Programme phenomenology Umberto Eco Knowing doesn't mean so much
Y'know, if you log in, you can write something here, or contact authors directly on the site. Create a New User if you don't already have an account.
  Epicenter
Login
Password

password reminder
register

Everything2 Help

Cool Staff Picks
Just another sprinkling of indeterminacy
FINALLY: Morally Bankrupt but Rich on Beads (the New Orleans gathering aftermath node)
Bullfighting
NFL trick plays
I wrote you a letter on the bus back from the city, but that's a different kind of weary
Wuthering Heights
Think of us as a lost
Arabic coffee
White Star Line
Dian Fossey
Existentialism
The Road to Wigan Pier
Link and Link
Homeschooling
New Writeups
doctor wilson
Soup, of the green variety(recipe)
Ctrl Y
cognitive dissonance(fiction)
SharQ
Gone Baby Gone(review)
halfWit
If I could, I'd title this "Freedom"(thing)
Roninspoon
Airline Hero(thing)
Ktistec
Why Women Are Always Cold(person)
doctor wilson
Drug policy reform(thing)
tejasa
Easy Raspberry Cheesecake(recipe)
Joysim
Drug policy reform(idea)
aneurin
Tyburn(place)
niruena
Boiling to death(idea)
artman2003
summer(thing)
doctor wilson
The Silver City and the Silent Sea(log)
Dreamvirus
The Silver City and the Silent Sea(poetry)
Aerobe
A nihilist's soulmate(poetry)
E2 is a by-product of the existence of The Everything Development Company