If you are happy to see this you may thank OldMiner. He emailed me about using one of my old nodes in a podcast. I was curious...
Yes, I left abruptly and in retrospect it was pretty childish to nuke my recent works. It was especially mean of me to nuke my little game as it had already involved a few noders and asked them to do work on its behalf. That was really rude.
I'm still probably going to be mostly away or 'fled' but maybe a small explanation and an apology of sorts are in order. As it turns out, I received a lot of messages about this (more than I expected).
First, why I left - I knew that when I took on the grandiose plan of reinvigorating E2 with fun and frivolity I was in way over my head. I'm neither fun nor frivolous. I also knew that I was courting the nuke fairy.
My first nuke was my one word writeup "bump" in the Letters to the Editor. I disagreed with that nuke but I understood it. I felt that even that one word was fairly well laden with commentary and it deserved its place. Whatever...
The second nuke really sent me over the edge though. In a node titled "running bad" I posted a poker hand history and included a two line comment that explained the difference between a bad beat and running bad. That node quickly fell to -10 in rep and that is fair. It isn't up to E2's usual standards. That doesn't change the fact that it was a perfectly legit writeup by every rule here, and, that regardless of the fact that nobody here plays enough poker to understand it, it was still a succinct explanation of a subtle difference. The editor who nuked it was the same as the one who nuked the "bump" writeup and in neither case did they seek to contact me first, to even try to understand them. It was precisely that attitude that I felt was unnecessary around here and that it should bite me so hard so quickly was too much. Those were my first nuked nodes since my first month here...
Look, this site is already hampered by the fact that it has no pictures or videos, the only 'live' interaction is a stale chat feature and the most common replacement for that on the net, the forum or comment, does not yet exist here. This site faces an uphill battle for traffic. The "good old days" when membership was high were different in one key way - any contribution was welcome. Coincidence? I think not.
This site apparently wants to be elite and high quality. Well, you are welcome to it. I tried that route and the only reward was a very mild, vain, ego stroke from time to time. I don't need that.
Understand, too, I'm not trying to say anything about the current membership. The people I know, as little as I know them, I like just fine. I never attended a nodermeet though, I never got all the way into the community. That makes blowing up or leaving (again) pretty easy.
I still check in every few months to see if anything significant has changed. I always did like this site and I hope one day it really blows up again, steps out in popularity where it deserves to be. I hope it gets several hundred active users and has tons of chat channels and etc. Until then, though, I have other things to do.
In order of the messages received, my responses and a request:
RedOmega - yes, it maybe was a valuable thing I was trying, so why'd you stomp on it at every other opportunity?
Swap - Eh? Oh. :)
RACECAR - It wasn't you :) I have a man-crush on you and your fishies.
avalyn - very professional, thank you
Junkill - I'm so, so sorry. You have always been so nice to me, so supportive. I should not have done what I did and I feel like a real ass now. I hope you've forgiven me for that and will consider trying again.
Auduster - Same as for Junkill but one extra request. Will you take it over? As much as it needs a boss anyways...
Deb - you are so sweet :) I didn't see that until now and now I'm going about this all stupid and public like. I'd be a better member if I had more discretion ;)
clone19 - Sorry :/ Yeah. I'm gonna try to fix that.
Last - will some nice editor or admin, whoever has the power, please unnuke citation needed? It won't be a secret anymore but hey, it wasn't going to last long as one anyways. I do think it was a good and fun idea and I hope people play with it.
If that flies, there is no reason not to unnuke my contributions to it - Roger Penrose Trafalgar Square Matt Dillon and, as lame as it is, Kyle Orton. That's the point though eh? People around here just can't stand a lame effort :) Fix it up and renuke it when it is appropriate.
Since mauler thought it funny enough to C!, unnuking How to get YouTube hits would be nice. That writeup had nothing to do with citation needed and there was no reason for me to nuke it.
And, lastly, if a quorum of editors can see my side of it I'd like running bad unnuked. It was the only one that was nuked without my say so and the main one I disagreed with. I think it is a fine addition to the nodegel. Could it be better? Hell yeah. As verbose as I am I could easily write a novel on the topic that would walk every member through to complete understanding of the topic. I didn't want to, though, and I still don't. I think what I wrote was sufficient and leaves room for someone more ambitious to pick it up if they want.